Q1. Should we judge those from the past by the standards of today? How will historians in the future judge us?

我们应该用今天的标准评价前人吗？未来的历史学家又将怎样评价我们？

Q2. Has the ‘construct of gender’ been more beneficial or more harmful to humanity throughout history?

在人类历史中，“性别建构”对人类带来的是福音还是灾难？

Q3. ‘More history has happened in Oxford, per square foot, than any other place in the world.’ Discuss.

请讨论："在牛津的每一寸土地上发生的历史都比世界上的其他地方多。"

Q1. Should ‘innocent until proven guilty’ apply not only to courts of law, but also to public censure?

适用于法律的“无罪推定”的原则也可以适用于公众舆论谴责吗？

Q2. To what extent does a codified constitution help or hinder liberty?

法典化的先发在多大程度上帮助或限制了自由？

Q3. When should force of law prevent a transaction, entered into freely between two competent, consenting adults?

法律应该在什么时候阻止两个具备行为能力的成年人之间自愿达成的交易？

Q1. Should we raise the voting age to 25?

我们应该把投票年龄提高到25岁吗？

Q2. Should the John Locke Institute change its name?

约翰洛克学院应该改名吗？

Q3. Is Oxford overrated?

牛津大学被高估了吗？

Q4. Just because you’re a millionaire doesn’t mean you should get better healthcare than the rest of us, does it?

仅仅因为你是百万富翁，这并不意味着你应该比其他人得到更好的医疗保健，不是吗？

Q5. What should we do to improve the lives of poor people?

我们应该做些什么来改善穷人的生活？

Q6. Have things improved?

周围的情况有改善吗？

Q7. Before a certain time almost everybody would have held some belief which we now find repugnant. Does this mean we cannot admire or commemorate the people who helped to shape the modern world?

在某个特定的时间之前，几乎每个人都会持有某种我们现在感到厌恶的信仰。这是否意味着我们不能钦佩或纪念那些帮助塑造现代世界的人？

Q8. Should the law ever prevent people from freely making self-harming decisions? If so, what should and shouldn’t be forbidden - and according to which principles?

法律是否应该阻止人们自由做出自我伤害的决定？如果是这样的话，什么应该被禁止，什么不应该被禁止？根据哪些原则？